
Project Overseer
Distributed Democracy
-
Maintain the republic. Votes and their validity are never at question.
-
Reorganize government so all stakeholders have a say in the governance of the United States of America and so that all representatives are held accountable to their position. All representatives should be experts in the field they help govern and manage.
-
A voting system as well as an automated accountability and governance administration system.
Project Overseer envisions a fundamental restructuring of governance, moving towards a system of Distributed Democracy. Central to this vision is the creation of a transparent and accountable framework that ensures votes are unquestionable, representatives are experts in their fields, and all stakeholders have a voice. The aim is to transition to a system that leverages technology, specifically a robust voting and automated governance administration system, to facilitate either a republic or a direct democracy, as determined by the citizenry. The U.S. Constitution does not explicitly mandate whether the United States must function as a direct democracy or a representative democracy, granting flexibility for the citizenry to shape the governance model. This constitutional ambiguity allows Project Overseer to propose a system that could evolve into either form, based on public will, without conflicting with the foundational legal framework. This initiative seeks to rectify perceived shortcomings in current governance models, such as corruption and unjustified actions, by establishing a system of extreme accountability and citizen-driven evolution.
The core thesis of Project Overseer revolves around the implementation of a Distributed Democracy, underpinned by advanced technological solutions and a commitment to transparency. Recognizing the need for a governance system that truly represents the people, the project proposes a shift towards a model where all stakeholders contribute to decision-making. This involves reorganizing government structures, ensuring representatives are experts in their respective fields, and establishing an automated accountability system. By harnessing technologies like Hedera's hashgraph for secure transactions and leveraging concepts like Diia's open-source digital services, Project Overseer aims to create a more equitable and efficient governance framework, where power is balanced and citizen participation is paramount.
Project Overseer advances a transformative vision for the United States, advocating for a transition to a Distributed Democracy that integrates cutting-edge technology and emphasizes citizen empowerment. The project's main thesis is to establish a governance system that ensures voting integrity, expert-led representation, and automated accountability, effectively moving towards a model where decisions are made with the input and consent of the citizenry. The U.S. Constitution’s silence on prescribing a specific democratic model—whether direct or representative—provides the legal flexibility for this transition, enabling a governance system that can adapt to the preferences of the people while remaining anchored in constitutional principles. By drawing inspiration from historical ideals of liberty and incorporating modern advancements like decentralized ledger technology and open-source digital services, Project Overseer seeks to rectify the perceived drift from founding principles and create a more responsive, responsible, and citizen-centric system of governance, leading to outcomes like Universal Basic Income and a restructured tax system.
Technology
Hadera
https://hedera.com/hh_whitepaper_v2.1-20200815.pdf
The Hadera whitepaper gives an overview how hashgraph works and of some of its properties - particularly how it is fair, fast, Byzantine, ACID compliant, efficient, inexpensive, timestamped, and DoS resistant. The hashgraph is Byzantine Fault Tolerant (BFT) by the strongest definition - asynchronous BFT (AFT). A full technical report describing the hashgraph data structure and algorithm, including mathematical proofs that Hashgraph is ABFT, is included.
GOVERNANCE
-
A general-purpose public ledger should be governed by representatives from a broad range of market sectors, each with world-class expertise in their respective industries, and also selected to provide global geographic representation for all markets. Those that are governing need technical expertise so they can competently manage the technical roadmap. They need business expertise so they can manage business operations of the organization. They need expertise in economics and currency markets so they can manage the digital dollar. They need legal expertise to help navigate the evolving regulatory environment. In other words, governance should be by those globally recognized as world leaders in their respective industries, and representative of every market in the world.
-
People could choose on just how many and which level of decision making they want to participate in. This could be as much as a republic or as much as a direct democracy as the citizenry wants. As we transition to a more open and coordinated world, the balance of power can be finetuned by the stakeholders. No more unjustified war that the citizens don’t want to participate in. No more government decisions that run contrary to the mission of the government and to the needs of its constituents. No more corrupting the government to enrich the few.
-
Extreme accountability to the system which the citizenry decided to establish and which is constantly evaluated and evolving.
Digital Transformation
Diia — a mobile application with the most important digital documents and government services, which are always in your pocket. Open source is one of the world's top practices. European Covid-certificates and the European Digital Identity Wallet, as well as Linux, Mozilla Firefox, Android and MySQL, use this approach. From now on Diia also has Open Source.
Diia.Open Source - open source of the main government application
Diia is an app with access to citizen’s digital documents and government services.
The application was created so that Ukrainians could interact with the state in a few clicks, without spending their time on queues and paperwork - the Diia open source application will help countries, companies and communities build a foundation for long-term relationships. At the heart of these relations are openness, efficiency and humanity.
Libertarian America
The United States was indeed founded on principles that bear resemblance to Libertarian ideals. The Founding Fathers emphasized individual liberty, limited government intervention, and the protection of natural rights. They sought to establish a system of governance that prioritized personal freedoms and restricted the powers of centralized authority.
The Constitution, the cornerstone of American governance, reflects these Libertarian-leaning principles. It outlines a framework for a government with divided powers, checks and balances, and a Bill of Rights that explicitly protects individual liberties from government overreach.
The United States was founded on principles of individual liberty, limited government, and the protection of natural rights, which align closely with some aspects of Libertarian ideology. The framers of the U.S. Constitution sought to establish a system of government that would safeguard individual freedoms while also providing for the common good. They crafted a system of checks and balances with the three branches of government to prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful.
Throughout American history, there have been periods of adherence to these principles, where the federal government played a relatively minimal role in the lives of citizens. However, especially in recent decades, there has been a notable departure from these ideals. The federal government has expanded its reach into various aspects of society and the economy, implementing regulations, social programs, and interventions that often exceed the bounds originally envisioned by the Founders.
Therefore, while the United States was indeed intended to embody Libertarian ideals to a significant extent, the present form of the federal government has drifted away from these principles in favor of increased interventionism and regulation. This departure has sparked debates and movements seeking to realign the country with its founding principles of individual liberty and limited government.
While the Founding Fathers espoused principles that align with Libertarian ideology, there are several present-day Libertarian ideas that would have been inconceivable in their time. Here are a few examples:
Pure Laissez-faire Capitalism: While the Founders believed in limited government intervention in the economy, they also recognized the importance of government regulation to prevent monopolies, ensure fair competition, and protect consumers. They understood that unregulated capitalism could lead to exploitation and economic instability. Present-day Libertarians often advocate for minimal government involvement in the economy, including the removal of regulations that the Founders might have considered necessary for maintaining a functioning market.
Non-Interventionism in Foreign Policy: While the Founders generally favored avoiding entangling alliances and foreign conflicts, they also recognized the need to protect national interests and ensure national security. Present-day Libertarian ideas regarding non-interventionism in foreign policy, including extreme reluctance to engage in any form of military intervention or foreign aid, might have been at odds with the Founders' understanding of the need to defend the nation and promote its interests abroad when necessary.
Social Issues: The Founders lived in a time when social norms and values were significantly different from those of today. While they championed individual liberties, including freedom of speech and religion, their views on social issues such as LGBTQ+ rights, drug legalization, and reproductive rights would likely have been influenced by the societal norms of their time. Present-day Libertarian positions on these issues, which often prioritize individual autonomy and personal freedom, might have clashed with the moral and cultural context of the Founders' era.
Environmental Protection: Environmental concerns and the need for conservation were not major issues during the Founding era. While the Founders valued private property rights and believed in limited government intervention, they might not have foreseen the environmental challenges that modern societies face. Present-day Libertarian ideas on environmental protection, which often prioritize property rights over environmental regulation, might conflict with the Founders' understanding of the government's role in preserving natural resources for future generations.
Overall, while the Founding Fathers laid the groundwork for principles that align with Libertarian ideology, the evolution of society and the emergence of new challenges mean that there are present-day Libertarian ideas that they might have disagreed with or not fully contemplated in their time.
Opinions on the matter:
Elon Musk is for Project Overseer: https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1889442712983630013?s=46
Primary Outcomes:
Universal Basic Income (UBI)
The Deep and Enduring History of Universal Basic Income | The MIT Press Reader
Onto the New Golden Age
How do we as a nation get to UBI?
Sovereign Wealth Fund
A Plan For Establishing A United States Sovereign Wealth Fund
WASHINGTON, Feb 3 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Monday ordering the creation of a sovereign wealth fund within the next year, saying it could potentially buy the short video app TikTok.
If created, the sovereign wealth fund could place the U.S. alongside numerous other countries, particularly in the Middle East and Asia, that have launched similar funds as a way to make direct investments with government dollars.
A Plan For Establishing A United States Sovereign Wealth Fund - The White House - February 3, 2025
Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Orders Plan for a United States Sovereign Wealth Fund - The White House - February 3, 2025
Eradicate the IRS.
A UBI will help eliminate the need for Citizens being taxed by the IRS. Only corporations and wealthy residents should be taxed.